Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation Conditions for Egyptian Bread Wheat cv. G164
Abstract
Agrobacterium-mediated transforma- tion was firstly used to transform dicot species. Nevertheless, this highly efficient and successful method was not used for cereal transformation as mono- cots were widely considered to be outside the natural host range of Agrobacterium. Fortunately, a few individuals continued to defy the conventional wisdom, and were finally rewarded with success, first with rice and then all of the major cereals. One of the major barriers to the use of Agrobacterium to transform cereals was the absence of wound response and the associated activation of virulence genes. These problems were overcome with the use of actively dividing, embryogenic cells, such as immature embryos and calli induced from scutella, which are co- cultivated with Agrobacterium in the presence of acetosyringone, which is a potent inducer of virulence genes (Vasil, 2005).
Wheat is one of the most important field crops worldwide, with the largest harvested area and production levels. As a monocotyledonous plant, wheat has lagged behind dicotyledonous plants in ease and efficiency of transformation
using Agrobacterium-based technique. Immature embryos have long been known to be a good regenerable explant source for wheat and there are effective protocols using biolistics for transformation and regeneration of this tissue. However, de- spite considerable interest there are few publications describing successful Agro- bacterium-mediated transformation of wheat (Cheng et al., 1997; Weir et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2003). However, research to make the Agrobacterium- based transformation method amendable to cereal crops has continued as the system is perceived to possess several advantages over other forms of transformation including: the ability to transfer large segments of DNA with minimal rearrangement; the precise insertion of transgenes resulting in fewer copies of inserted genes; and it is a simple technology with lower cost (Amoah et al., 2001). Moreover, it allows for the stable integration of a defined segment of DNA into the plant genome and generally results in an improved stability of expression over generations than the direct DNA delivery methods (Smith and Hood, 1995). In addition, Agrobacterium transformation may facilitate removal of plant selectable marker genes by segregation. These are important considerations, particularly when creating genetically manipulated lines in crop species for field testing; when the presence of unnecessary DNA and transgene arrangement/copy number are scrutinized as part of the regulatory processes (Wu et al., 2003).
The majority of wheat transforma- tion investigations that have been reported (Vasil et al. 1992, 1993; Weeks et al. 1993; Nehra et al. 1994; Becker et al. 1994; Zhou et al. 1995; Zhang et al. 2000, Bahieldin et al., 2000) utilized microparti- cle bombardment technology. Cheng et al. (1997) first reported the success of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in wheat with transformation efficiency 1-4%, but these results were limited to small-scale experiments and selection for the neomycin phosphotransferase II gene (nptII). Since then, some advances have been achieved (Jones et al., 2005). Agro- bacterium-mediated wheat transforma- tion, however, has not yet become an established and robust method of genetic transformation because the ability to rou- tinely transform wheat using Agrobac- terium tumefaciens is currently restricted to a few well-resourced laboratories worldwide (Jones et al., 2005).
A critical step in the development of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation is the establishment of optimal conditions for T-DNA delivery into tissues from which whole plants can be regenerated (Amoah et al., 2001). Success in wheat transformation using Agrobacterium requires the identification of a model tissue culture system with a high capacity for producing regenerable cells, the optimization of parameters for gene transfer into those cells and tailoring selection and regeneration procedures to recover transgenic plants (Jones et al., 2005). In the present investigation, we optimized the conditions for genetic transformation of wheat cv. Giza 164 by examining three variables influencing T- DNA delivery and the regeneration of fertile plants in one of the commercially important Egyptian wheat variety.
References
Ali, S., Z., Xianyin Q. Xue, M. J. Hassan and H. Qian (2007). Investigations for improved genetic transforma- tion mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in two rice cultivars. Biotechnology, 6: 138-147.
Amoah, B. K., C. Wu, C. Sparks and H. C. Jones (2001). Factors influen- cing Agrobacterium-mediated tran- sient expression of uidA in wheat inflorescence tissue. J. of Exp. Bot., 52: 1135-1142.
Assem, S. K., N. Borg and H. A. El-Itriby (2006). Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation of maize in- bred lines using immature embryos and a standard binary vector sys- tem. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol., 35:
-186.
Bahieldin, A., R. Qu, W. Dyer, A. S. Haider and M. A. Madkour (2000). A modified procedure for rapid re- covery of transgenic wheat plants. Egypt J. Genet. Cytol., 29: 11-23.
Becker D., R. Brettschneider and H. Lörz (1994). Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scutellum tissue. Plant J., 5: 299-301.
Cheng, M., J. E. Fry, S. Z. Pang, H. P. Zhou, C. M. Hironaka, D. R. Dun- can, T. W. Conner and Y. C. Wan (1997). Genetic transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol., 115: 971-980.
Debasis, P., V. Dalia and K. Paramjit (2006). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of mature embryos of Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum. Current Science, 91: 307-317.
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biom., 11: 1-42.
Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez (1984). “Statistical Procedures for Agricul- tural Research”, 2nd Ed. John Wi- ley and Sons Ltd., New York, 680 pp.
Guo, G., F. Maiwald, P. Lorenzen, H. Steinbiss (1998). Factors influen- cing T-DNA delivery into wheat and barley cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Cereal Res. Commun, 26: 15-21.
Hood, E. E., G. L. Helmer, R. T. Fraley and M. D. Chilton (1986). The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T- DNA. J. Bacterio., 168: 1291-1301.
Jefferson, R. A. (1987). Assaying chi- meric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 5: 387-405.
Jones, H. D., A. Doherty and H. Wu (2005). Review of methodologies and a protocol for the Agrobacte- rium-mediated genetic transfor- mation of wheat. Plant Methods, 1, 5, doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-1-5.
Murashige, T. and F. Skoog (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.
Nehra, N. S., R. N. Chibban, N. Leung, K. Caswell, C. Mallard, L. Stein- hauer, M. Baga and K. K. Kartha (1994). Self-fertile transgenic wheat plants regenerated from isolated scutellar tissues following microprojectile bombardment with two distinct gene constructs. Plant J., 5: 285-297.
Ozias-Akins, P. and I. K. Vasil (1982).Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflores- cences of Triticum aestivum L. wheat - evidence for somatic em- bryogenesis. Protoplasma, 110: 95-105.
Pastori, G. M., M. D. Wilkinson, S. H. Steele, C. A. Sparks, H. D. Jones and M. A. J. Parry (2001). Age- dependent transformation fre- quency in elite wheat varieties. J. Exp Bot., 52: 857-863.
Smith, R. H. and E. E. Hood (1995). Agrobacterium tumefaciens trans- formation of monocotyledons. Crop Sci., 35: 301-309.
Stacey, J. and P. Issac (1994). Isolation of DNA from plants. In: Issac P (ed). Methods in molecular biology - Protocols for Nucleic Acid Analysis by Non-Radioactive Probes. Humana Press, Totowa, p. 9-15.
Vasil, I. K. (2005). The story of trans- genic cereals: The challenge, the debate, and the solution - a historical perspective. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 41: 577-583.
Vasil, V., A. M. Castillo, M. E. Fromm and I. K. Vasil (1992). Herbicide- resistant fertile transgenic wheat plants obtained by microprojectile bombardment of regenerable em- bryogeic callus. Bio/Technol, 10: 667-674.
Vasil, V., V. Srivastava, A. M. Castillo, M. E. Fromm and I. K. Vasil (1993). Rapid production of trans- genic wheat plants by direct bombardment of cultured imma- ture embryos. Bio. Technology, 11: 1553-1558.
Weeks, J. T., O. D. Anderson and A. E. Blechl (1993). Rapid production of multiple independent lines of fertile transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol., 102: 1077-1084.
Weir, B., X. Gu, M. B. Wang, N. Upadhyaya, A. R. Elliott and R. I. S. Brettle (2001). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transforma- tion of wheat using suspension cells as a model system and green fluorescent protein as a visual marker. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 28: 807-818.
Wu, H., C. Sparks, B. Amoah and H. D. Jones (2003). Factors influencing successful Agrobacterium-me- diated genetic transformation of wheat. Plant Cell Reports, 21: 659-668.
Zhang, L., J. J. Rybczynski, W. G. Langenberg, A. Mitra and R. French (2000). An efficient wheat transformation procedure: trans- formed calli with long-term morphogenic potential for plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep., 19: 241-250.
Zhou, H., J. W. Arrowsmith, M. E. Fromm, C. M. Hironaka, M. L. Taylor, D. Rodriguez, M. E. Pajeau, S. M. Brown, C. G. Santino and J. E. Fry (1995). Glyphosate-tolerant CP4 and GOX genes as a selectable marker in wheat transformation. Plant Cell Rep., 15: 159-163.