This is an outdated version published on 2020-08-30. Read the most recent version.

TRANSFORMATION SYSTEM OF MATURE EMBRYO OF SOME EGYPTIAN BARLEY GENOTYPES

Authors

  • SHAIMAA E. RASHAD Microbial Genetics Dept., National Research Center
  • F. M. ABDEL-TAWAB Genetics Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University
  • EMAN M. FAHMY Genetics Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University
  • M. M SAKR Plant Biotechnology Dept., National Research Center

Abstract

Transformation of barley based on the infection of mature embryos with Agrobacterium tumefactions system used for transformation of explants El-Kasrgenotype using the strain harbors the pITB-AFP plasmid vector which contains defensin (AFP) gene, hygromycin phosphor transferase (hpt) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) genes as selectable and marker genes. The Transient expression of AFP gene was investigated as a preliminary test of the transformation efficiency. Transformation experiments were carried out with different parameters and the one barley genotype El-Kasr. The tested transformation parameters included: the type of explants mature embryos based on the results of GUS transient expression. PCR analysis using primers specific for the AFP and GUS genes with specific probe was applied. The results revealed that mature embryo axis explants infected with Agrobacterium showed blue spot (positive Gus expression). Conversely, negative GUS expression was observed with untransformed embryo axis of barley mature embryos (intact) of the three genotypes gave the highest percentages of embryo-genic calli when cultured on medium M1 in comparison with the other two media. This was followed by the percentage of roots of the two genotypes (Giza126 and Giza130), respectively, (9% and 0.1%). PCR showed bands corresponding to the expected size of 300 bp for partial length of the AFP gene, and the expected size of 300 bp for partial length of GUS gene by intact mature embryos of genotype (El-Kasr) on the three media (16%). This was followed by the percentage of roots of the two genotypes (Giza126 and Giza130), respectively. Evidently, El-Kasr is the best genotype for callus, shoots and roots that were amenable totransformation.

References

Abumhadi N., Kamenarova K., Todorovska E., Dimov G., Trifonova A., Gecheff K. and Atanassov A. (2005). Callus induction and plant regeneration from barley mature embryos (HordeumvulgareL.). Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 19: 32-38.

Bregitzer P., (1992). Plant regeneration and callus type in barley: effects of genotype and culture medium. Crop Science, 32: 1108-1112.

Cho, M. J., Jiang W. and Lemaux P. G. (1998). Transformation of recalcitrant barley cultivars through improvement of regenerability and decreased albinism. Plant Sci., 138: 229-244.

Dahleen, L.S. (1999). Donor-plant environment effects on regeneration from barley embryoderivedcallus. Crop Science, 39:682-685.

Dahleen L.S. and Bregitzer P. (2002). An improved media system for high regeneration rates from barley immature embryo derived callus cultures of commercial cultivars. Crop Sci., 42: 934-938.

Gozukirmizi N. and Temel A. (2011).Advances in barley biotechnology: Tissue culture and molecular markers. In: Barley: Production, Cultivation and Uses. Elfson, S.B., editor. Ottawa: Nova Science Publishers., p. 129-159.

Harwood W. A., Bartlett J., Alves S., Perry M., Smedley M., Leyland N. and Snape J. W. (2009).Barley transformation using Agrobacterium-mediated techniques. Methods in Molecular Biology, Transgenic Wheat, Barley and Oats, 478: 137-147.

Harwood W. A., Ross S. M., Cilento P. and Snape J. W. (2000).The effect of DNA/gold particle preparation technique, and particle bombardment device, on the transformation of barley (Hordeumvulgare L.).Euphytica, 111: 67-76.

Hussein E. H. A., Madkour M. A., Shireen K. A. and M. A. R. Al-Zahraa (2003). Embryogenic callus for-mation and plant regeneration from immature embryos of some barley genotypes (HordeumvulgareL.). Arab J. Biotech., 7: 111-122.

Manoharan M. and Dahleen L. S. (2002).Genetic transformation of the commercial barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar conlon by particle bombardment of callus. Plant Cell Rep., 21:76-80.

Murashige T. and Skoog F. (1962).A revised medium for RAPD growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant, 15: 473-497.

Ren J. P., Wanga X. G. and Jun A. Y. (2010). Dicamba and sugar effects on callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryo culture of wheat. Agricultural Sciences in China, 9: 1-31.

Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F. and Maniatis T. (1989). Molecular cloning.A laboratory manual, second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1: 3-9.

Sharma K.V., Tamas M., Bettina H., Helmut M., Cornelia G., Ellen H., Robert H., Florian B., Claus W., feussner I., mendel R. R. and Jutta S. (2005). Genetic transformation of barley to modify expression of a 13-lipoxygenase. Acta. Biol. Szegediensis, 49: 33-34.

Stangeland B. and Zhian S. (2002).An improved clearing method for GUS assay in Arabidopsis endosperm and seeds. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 20: 107-114.

Temel A., Kartal G. and Gozukirmizi N. (2008).Genetic and epigenetic variations in barley calli cultures. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 22:911-914.

Zhang S., Warkentin D., Sun B., Zhong H. and Stichlen M. B. (1996). Variation in the inheritance of expression among sub-clones for unselected (UidA) and selected (Bar) transgenes in maize (Zea mays L.).Theor. Appl. Genet., 92: 752-761.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-30

Versions

Issue

Vol. 49 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2