MARKERS ASSISTED SELECTION FOR SALT TOLERANCE AMONG SOME COTTON (Gossypium barbadense L.) GENOTYPES.

Authors

  • BADEAA A. MAHMOUD Cotton Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza
  • SAMAR A. OMAR Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University
  • SH. A. SHAKER Cotton Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza
  • A. E. I. DARWESH Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University

Abstract

Ten Egyptian cotton genotypes were evaluated at normal and saline soil conditions for yield and fiber properties through two years. The data revealed that increasing salt concentration in soil solution leads to significantly decreasing in seed cotton yield and other yield related characters except for lint percentage which showed increasing values under saline condition. Under saline condition, plant height was greatly reduced in high for about 37-52%, followed by reduction in number of fruiting sympodia of about 49-72% as compared with normal condition. Therefore, the reductions in cotton yield under stress condition, in generally, due to reduction in boll production primarily because of fewer flowers and less boll number due to increased boll abortions. Among the cotton genotypes, Giza 86 followed by Giza 94 recorded high seed cotton yield under both conditions and these genotypes recorded the minimum reduction in seed cotton yield under saline condition. The first three principal components PC were significant (p> 0.01) and accounted for 84.62 among genotypes variance with Eigen values more than unity. The first principal components accounted for maximum variability in the data with respect to succeeding components. PC1 explained for about 41.502% of the total variability amongst genotypes with the largest Eigen values 5.395 and dominated by a large loading for most yield and fiber characters i.e., seed cotton yield, lint yield, boll weight, seed index, lint index, micronaire reading and susceptibility index. In the second PC axis, plants with high fiber length and length uniformity with decreased in first node influenced by a reduced in lint percentage and other yield potential with decreased fiber fineness. The rest axis accounted about 10.91% of the total variability and domintialy affected by sympodial branches. Under saline condition the ten cotton genotypes were grouped into six major clusters on the basis of dissimilarity among genotypes and relative contribution of evaluated characters. The data revealed that cluster 3 showed the highest seed cotton yield (K/Fed) and either yield attributed characters with acceptable fiber properties. This cluster contained one genotype, Giza 86, and characterized by high susceptibility index for saline condition. Seventy five out of 109 bands were polymorphic and representing 80% of the total generated bands with an average of 6.25polymorphic bands per primer, showing considerable genetic variation among the ten cotton genotypes. Based on RAPD data analysis, the similarity matrix among the 10 varieties ranged from 0.738 to 0.94. The highest similarity value revealed was between Giza-92 and Giza-70 (0.94), while the lowest similarity value was shown between Giza-94 and Giza-93. The dendrogram separated all genotypes into two main groups where Giza-86 was placed in one group and all other genotypes were placed in the second one. This distribution clearly agreed with the performance of Giza 86 as the best genotype comparing with others according to vegetative traits studied and yield and its attributes. Results from morphological measurements and RAPD markers are complementary for each other in studying and understanding the genetic control of saline tolerance in plant population, and both gave essential information for understanding genetic divergence of Egyptian cotton germplasm.

References

Abdel Ghany, A. A. and E. A. Zaki (2003). DNA sequences of RAPD fragments in the Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense). African Journal of Biotechnology, 5: 129-132.

Abdel-Tawab, F. M., Eman M. Fahmy, A. Bahieldin and Hala F. Eissa (1997). Molecular markers for salt tolerance in some inbreds of maize (Zea mays L.). Arab Univ. J. Agric. Sci., Ain Shams Univ., 5: 389-417.

Abdel-Tawab, F. M., Gh. Gad El-Karim, A. A. El-Gohary, F. A. El-Domiati, A. Bahieldin, A. Shokry and M. A. Madkour (2001). Bulked segregant analysis to develop molecular markers for some fiber qualities in Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L). Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol., 29: 103-114.

Azhar, F. M., A. A. Khan and N. Saleem (2007). Genetic mechanism controlling salt tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L. seedlings. Pak. J. Bot., 39: 115-121.

Bhatti, M. A., F. M. Azhar and A. W. Alvi (2006). Estimation of additive, dominance and epistatic components of cotton grown in salinized conditions. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 08: 624-627.

Chahal, G. S. and S. S. Gosal (2002). In Principles and Procedures of Plant Breeding. Oxford: Alpha Science International Ltd. p: 399-412.

Dinakaran, E., S. Thirumeni and K. Paramasivam (2012). Yield and fibre quality components analysis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under salinity. Annals of Biological Res., 3: 3910-3915.

Dwivedi, G. K., M. Dwivedi and S. S. Pal (1990). Modes of application of micronutrients in acid soil in soybean - wheat crop sequence. J. of Indian Soc. of Soil Sci., 38: 458- 563.

El-Mansy, Y. M., M. M. El-Lawendy, Y. A. Soliman and K. F. Khidr Abdelltif (2012). Cotton germplasm diversity and its relation to varietal improvement as revealed by agronomic characters and SSR markers technique. Minf. J. Agric. Res., 37: 337-349.

El-Mansy, Y. M., M. E. Abd El-Salam and B. M. Ramdan (2014). Multivariate analysis of genetic divergence and combining ability in G. Barbadense L. J. Agreic. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., 40: 85-103.

El-Kadi, D. A., S. A. Afiah, M. A. Aly and A. E. Badran (2006). Bulked segregant analysis to develop molecular markers for salt tolerance in Egyptian cotton. Arab J. Biotechnol., 9: 129-142.

Falconer, D. S. (1981). In Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 3rd ed., Longman, New York.

Gepts, P. (1993). The use of molecular and biochemical markers in crop evolution studies. In: M. K. Hecht (Ed.) Evolutionary Biology, Plenum Press, New York, 27: 51-94.

Hair, J. F., Jr. R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham (1987). In Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. Mac Millan Pub. Co. New York.

Haritha, T. and M. L. Ahamed (2013). Multivariate analysis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Research, 46: 217-222.

Johnson, R. A. and D. W. Wichern (1988). In Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. NJ, USA.

Karademir, C., E. Karademir, O. Gencer (2011). Yield and fiber quality of F1 and F2 generations of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress conditions. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 17: 795-805.

Mujtaba, S. M., S. Mughal and M. H. Naqvi (2003). Reclamation of saline soils through biological approaches. Business Recorder, June, 2003.

Multani, D. S. and B. R. Lyon (1995). Genetic fingerprinting of Australian cotton cultivars with RAPD markers. Genome, 38: 1005-1008.

Nizamani, A. A., A. R. Ismail, R. Junin, A. Q. Dayo, A. H. Tunio, Z. H. Ibupoto and M. A. M. Sidek (2017). Synthesis of titaniabentonite nano composite and its applications in water-based drilling fluids. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56: 949-954.

Rana, M. K. and K. V. Bhat (2002). Genetic diversity analysis in Indian diploid cotton (Gossypium spp.) using RAPD markers. Indian J. Genet., 62: 11-14.

Rieseberg, L. H. (1996). Homology among RAPD fragments in inter- specific comparisons. Mol. Ecol., 5: 99-105.

Shaker, A. S., H. N. Hermiz, T. R. Al- Khatib and R. M. Mohammed (2016). Egg shape characterization for four genetic groups of Kurdish local chickens. Food and Nutrition Science, 1: 20-25.

SPSS (1995). SPSS computer user's guide, USA.

Williams, J. G., K. Kubelik, A. R. J. Livak, A. K. J. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey (1990). DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res., 18: 6531-6535.

Wu, Y. T., T. Z. Zhang and J. M. Yin (2001). Genetic diversity detected by DNA markers and phenotypes in upland cotton, Chuan Xue Bao, 28: 1040-1050.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-13

Issue

Section

Articles