COMPREHENSIVE AGRONOMIC AND MOLECULAR EVALUATION OF BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES IN VARIOUS EGYPTIAN ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

  • HANAA S. H. BAKRY Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia University, El Minia, Eg-61519
  • MAHDY E.E. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Eg-71515
  • RASHA E.E. MAHDY Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Eg-71515
  • FOUAD H.M. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia University, El Minia, Eg-61519
  • BAHAA ABUGAMMIE Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia University, El Minia, Eg-61519
  • SOLTAN H. A. H. Central Laboratory of Organic Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Eg-12619

Abstract

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that all of the traits evaluated showed significant (P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01) differences in the different environments, genotypes, and the interaction of genotype × environment; consequently, there was considerable variability in the genetic make-up and differential response to environmental conditions of the activities of these twelve genotypic types of bread wheat grown. For the third environment tested, the heading date was the earliest; however, in the first and second environments, these two locations showed a superior performance in plant height, biological yield, grain yield, spike length, number of spikes/row, and 100 grain weight than the third location. Six genotypes, specifically lines (1, 2, 13, 35, 37, and 38), yielded higher grain yield than Giza 164, the commercial standard variety; thus demonstrating the potential to improve the overall genetic quality of the wheat crop. The use of 10 SCoT primers to carry out molecular analysis produced 67 Amplifications with 89.12% Polymorphism, demonstrating to be very efficient markers for the genetic difference. The genetic distance values corresponded with a high correlation with a high degree of phenotypic variation. In conclusion, both agronomic evaluation and efficient utilization of SCoT markers, genetic distance, and phenotypic variation are expected to be of substantial benefit in improving wheat.

References

Abd El-Moneim D., Alqahtani M. M., Abdein M. A., and Germous M. O. (2020). Drought and salinity stress response in wheat: Physiological and TaNAC gene expression analysis in contrasting Egyptian wheat genotypes. J. of Plant Biotechnology, 47(1): 1-14.

Abouseada H. H., Mohamed A. S., Teleb S. S., Badr A., Tantawy M. E., Ibrahim, S. D., Ellmouni F. Y. and Ibrahim M., (2023). Genetic diversity analysis in wheat cultivars using SCoT and ISSR markers, chloroplast DNA barcoding and grain SEM. BMC Plant Biology, 23, Article 1.

Ali A., Momand M. J., Ali M., Rahman S. U. and Abbas S., (2024). Estimation of phenotypic and genotypic correlation analysis in F3 populations of bread wheat genotypes. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 12 (6): 905-910.

Altaf M. T., Yalinkilic N. A., Batbad S., Ali A., Nadeem M. A. and Baloch F. S., (2024). Applicability of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers for the assessment of genetic diversity in bread wheat germplasm. Molecular Biology Reports, 51(1), 584.

Choudhary S., Gaur S. C. and Kumar S., (2025). Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield-associated traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol, 28(1): 56-68.

Chumamo M., (2025). Character association and path analysis of exotic bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for yield and related traits at Kokate and Hossana, Southern Ethiopia. European Journal of Ecology, Biology and Agriculture, 2(3): 128-135.

Dewey D.R. and Lu, K. H., (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J. 51, 515-518.

Fouad H. M., (2019). Stability analysis of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under water and heat stress conditions. Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 23 (3), 166- 182.

Fouad H. M., (2018). Correlation, path and regression analysis in some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L) genotypes under normal irrigation and drought conditions. Egypt. J. Agron. 40(2): 133-144.

Fouad H. M., Bakry H. S. and Soltan H. A., (2024a). Morphological and molecular characterization of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. SVU-International Journal of Agric. Sciences, 6(3): 155-171.

Fouad H. M., El-Karamity A. E., Salim M. A., Naguib S. R. and Ibrahim Sabah M., (2024b). Uni and multivariate methods to estimate stability of some bread wheat genotypes. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 15 (6): 303-310.

GelAnalyzer, Version 3 (2007). Gel Analyzer Ver.3 program software for windows. www.geocities.com/egygene.gene expression.’, Genome Res., 19:. 1419-1428.

Gomez K. A. and Gomez A. A., (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons. Hamidi H., Talebi R., and Keshavarzi F. (2014). Comparative efficiency of functional gene-based markers, start codon targeted polymorphism (SCoT), and conserved DNA- derived polymorphism (CDDP) with ISSR markers for diagnostic fingerprinting in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communications, 42(4): 558-567.

Johnson W. H., Robinson H. F. and Comstock R.E., (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy. J., 47(7): 314-319.

Khare V., Shukla R. S., Pandey S., Singh S. K. and Singh C., (2024). Exploring the genotype- environment interaction of bread wheat in ambient and high- temperature planting conditions: a rigorous investigation. Scientific Reports. 14(1): 1-16.

Kumar A., Yadav V. K., Kumar J., and Naik B. S. D., (2024). Estimate of genotypic and phenotypic correlation and path coefficients in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 27(3): 149-170.

Morsy A. S., Awadalla A., Hussein M. M. and El-Dek S., (2021). Impact of preceding crop, sowing methods and nano-fertilizer (amino mineral) on bread wheat production and quality in Toshka region, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 43.

Naheed H., (2021). Stability analysis of bread wheat lines using regression models. Sarhad J. Agric. 37(4): 1450-1457.

Philipp N., Weise S., Oppermann M., Börner A., Keilwagen J., Kilian B., Arend D., Zhao Y., Graner A., Reif J. C. and Schulthess A. W., (2019). Historical phenotypic data from seven decades of seed regeneration in a wheat ex situ collection. Scientific Data, 6(1), 137.

Ray D. K., Ramankutty N., Nathaniel D., Mueller P. C. W. and Foley, J. A., (2012). Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications, 3(1): Article 1293.

Shaban A. S., Arab S. A., Basuoni M. M., Abozahra M. S., Abdelkawy A. M. and Mohamed M. M., (2022). SCoT, ISSR, and SDS-PAGE investigation of genetic diversity in several Egyptian wheat genotypes under normal and drought conditions. Inter. J. of Agronomy, 2022, Article 1234567.

Shaygan N., Etminan A., Majidi Hervan I., Azizinezhad R. and Mohammadi R., (2021). The study of genetic diversity in a minicore collection of durum wheat genotypes using agromorphologi- cal traits and molecular markers. Cereal Research Communications, 49(1): 141-147.

Yalinkilic N. A., Batbad S., Altaf M. T., Ali A., Nadeem M. A. and Baloch F. S,. (2024). Applicability of SCoT markers in unraveling genetic variation and population structure among sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) germplasm. Molecular Biology Reports, 51(1): 584.

Zhang Y., Lam S. K., Li P., Zong Y., Zhang,D., Shi X. and Wang J., (2023). Early–maturing cultivar of winter wheat is more adaptable to elevated [CO2] and rising temperature in the eastern Loess Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 332, 109356.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-14

Issue

Section

Articles