PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF SOME BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare L.) ACCESSIONS IN EGYPT

Authors

  • SARA M. SHATA Botany Department, Faculty of Women for Arts, Science and Education, Ain-Shams University, Cairo
  • WAFAA M. SAID Botany Department, Faculty of Women for Arts, Science and Education, Ain-Shams University, Cairo
  • FATTHY M. ABDEL-TAWAB Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University, Giza
  • LAMYAA M. SAYED Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships of eleven accessions of Hordeum vulgare L. collected from different regions of Egypt were assessed. Fifteen quantitative morphological traits were used, the measured data were evaluated statistically using ANOVA, phylogenetic trees were constructed using UPGMA. Also, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and start codon targeted (SCoT) molecular marker techniques were used for DNA fingerprinting and assessing genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in barley germplasm. The results showed that SSR primers produced 50 bands ranged in size between 50-722 bp with 64% polymorphism percentage and SCoT primers produced 143 bands, ranged in size between 165-2060 bp with 72% polymorphism percentage. Polymorphic information content PIC was 0.44 and 0.82 for SSRs and SCoT, respectively. UPGMA dendrogram was divided into two clusters by each of morphological traits, SSRs, and SCoT analysis. Genetic similarity matrix was examined with Jacard’s coefficient, maximum similarity was found between B7 and B8 (0.98%) with quantitative morphological analysis, between B3 and B4 (94%) with SSRs analysis and between B9 and B11 (80%) with SCoT analysis. However, combined cluster analysis between the three components together revealed better resolution for distinction between these taxa.

References

Abdel-Tawab F. M., Rashed M. A., Azer S. A., El-Metabteb G. M. and khafaga F., (2008). Molecular fingerprinting and marker-assisted selection in citrus species. Egypt. J. Genet. & Cytol., 37: 335-358.

Booy G., Hendriks R. J. J., Sulderns M.J.M., Van Groenendeal J.M. and Vosman B., (2000). Genetic diversity and the survival of populations. Plan Biol., 2: 379-395.

Bothmer R. V., (1992). The wild species of Hordeum: relationships and potential use for improvement of cultivated barley. Barley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology., 3-18.

Botstein D., White R. L., Skolnick M., Davis R. W., (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 32: 314-331.

Boulos L., (1995). Flora of Egypt checklist. Al Hadara Publishing Cairo Egypt, 1-283.

Boulos L., (2005). Flora of Egypt Vol.VI. Al Hadara Publishing Cairo Egypt, 1-617.

Boulos L., (2009). Flora of Egypt checklist. Revised annotated edition. Al Hadara Publishing Cairo Egypt, 292.

Collard B. C. , and Mackill D. J., (2009). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 27: 86.

Dekker J., (2003). The foxtail (Setaria) species-group. Weed Science, 51: 641-656.

Gomez-Macpherson H., (2001). Hordeum vulgare. http://ecoport.org/ep?Plant=1232&entityType=PL****&entityDisplayCategory=full

Gorji A. M., Poczai P., Polgar Z. and Taller J., (2011). Efficiency of arbitrarily amplified dominant markers (SCoT, ISSR and RAPD) for diagnostic fingerprinting in tetraploid potato. Am. J. Potato Res., 88: 226-237.

Guo D. L., Zhang J. Y., and Liu C. H., (2012). Genetic diversity in some grape varieties revealed by SCoT analyses. Molecular Biology Reports, 39: 5307-5313.

Hagenblad J., Leino M. W., Afonso G. H., and Morales D. A., (2019). Morphological and genetic characterization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in the Canary Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66: 465-480.

Kianoosh C., Leila Z., Reza Z. A. and Saeid J. H., (2017). Study of genetic variation among diverse barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using agro-morphological traits and RAPD, ISSR, AFLP markers. Research Journal of Biotechnology, 12: 6.

Kumar P., Gupta V. K., Misra A. K., Modi D. R., and Pandey B. K., (2009). Potential of molecular markers in plant biotechnology. Plant omics, 2: 141.

Matus I. A. and P. Hayes M., (2002). Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome, 45: 1095-1106.

Naceur A. B., Chaabane R., El-Faleh M., Abdelly C., Ramla D., Nada A. and Sakr M., (2012). Genetic diversity analysis of North Africa’s barley using SSR markers. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 10: 13-21.

Nandha P. S. and Singh J., (2014). Comparative assessment of genetic diversity between wild and cultivated barley using g SSR and EST‐SSR markers. Plant breeding, 133: 28-35.

Nevo E., (1992). Barley: Genetics, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. University of Haifa: 19-43.

Olgun M., Budak Başçiftçi Z., Ayter N. G., Turan M., Koyuncu O., Ardıç M., Ağar G., and Takıl E., (2015). Genetik divergence in some barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes by RAPD and ISSR Analyses. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10: 102-109.

Robinson A. J., Love C. G., Batley J., Barker G. and Edwards D., (2004). Simple sequence repeats marker loci discovery using SSR primer. Bioinformatics, 20: 1475-1476.

Sneath P. H. A. and Sokal R. R., (1973). Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco, California.

Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R., and Graner A., (2003). Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106: 411-422.

Von Bothmer R. and Jacobson N., (1985). Barley origin, taxonomy, and related species. Barley Agronomy, 26: 19-51.

Williams J. G. K., Kubelike A. R., Livake K. T., Rafalski J. A. and Tingoy S., V. (1990). DNA polymorphism amplified by random primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Research, 18: 6531-6539.

√Xiong F., Zhong R., Han Z., Jiang J., He L., Zhuang W. and Tang R., (2011). Start codon targeted polymorphism for evaluation of functional genetic variation and relationships in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. Mol. Biol. Rep., 38: 3487-3494.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-23