USING MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME  GENE FOR AUTHENTICATION OF MEATS FROM DIFFERENT ANIMAL SOURCES

Authors

  • M. A. RASHED Genetics Dept., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra Alkhema, 11241, Cairo, Egypt
  • G. F. GOUDA Animal Production Dept., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra Alkhema, 11241, Cairo, Egypt
  • M. MAGDY Genetics Dept., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra Alkhema, 11241, Cairo, Egypt 2.
  • M. A. M. ABDELFATAH Animal Production Dept., Fac. Agric., Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra Alkhema, 11241, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

The current study aimed to use the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for authentication of meats from different animal sources, with special relevance to hala-related meat sources. In total, 35 raw meat samples were sampled, representing seven species, viz goats, sheep, pigs, cattle, camels, buffaloes and donkeys. Mitochondrial Cytochrome-b (mtCyt-b) gene sequences for the seven-investigated species were retrieved from GenBank database and aligned. Common universal forward oligonucleotide primer and specificreverse primer for each species were designed. DNA was extracted, PCR was performed using conventional assay and amplicons were resolved using standard gel electrophoresis. M-PCR proved to offer the following advantages: (i) PCR internal control: false negatives that pose potential problems in PCR are revealed in multiplex amplification since each amplicon allows internal control for the other amplified fragments. (ii) PCR efficiency of DNA template quality determination: with M-PCR technique degraded DNA templates show weaker signals for long bands than for short ones and for fall in amplification efficiency. (iii) PCR economic efficiency: by spotting multiple genes simultaneously, further information may be acquired from a single test run than would require more PCR reagents and preparation time. (iv) PCR rapidity: with M-PCR many meat products belonging to ruminants and non-ruminants can simultaneously analyzed in the same reaction for example, in the present work 100 meat samples could have been analyzed in 25 reaction tubes at the same time by using seven primer sets belonging to goat, sheep, pig, cattle, camel, buffalo and donkey. The present study depicts the consequences of an optimized M-PCR, which resulted in a single band of target from one species and no fragment was produced by non-specific amplicon. This study suggests an accurate, sensitive and rapid analytical technique for goat, sheep, pig, cattle, camel, buffalo and donkey meats based on PCR analysis of Cytochrome- b gene of mitochondrial DNA for discovery of meat-adulteration and mixed processed meat.

References

Abd El-Nasser, M., H. Labieb and Doaa M. Abd El-Aziz (2010). Identification of meat species in some meat products in Assiut city. Assiut Univ. Bull. Environ. Res., 13: 973- 975.

Abd El-Razik, A. B., A. R. Shemeis and T. M. A. Tantawi (2007). Multiplex PCR-genetic differentiation of inter-species meat mixtures based on orthologous cytochrome-b. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol., 36: 285- 295.

Abdel-Rahman, S. M., M. A. El-Saadani, K. M. Ashry and A. S. Haggag (2009). Detection of adulteration and identification of cat’s, dog’s, donkey’s and horse’s meat using species-specific PCR and PCRRFLP techniques. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3: 1716-1719.

Bai, W., W. Xu, K.Huang, Y. Yuan, S. Cao and Y. Luo (2009). A novel common primer multiplex PCR (CP-M-PCR) method for the simultaneous detection of meat species. Food Control, 20: 366-370.

Beer (2015). http://www.foodnavigator.com/Policy/Egypt-rocked-by-dogand- donkey-meat-scandal. Breslauer, K. J., F. Ronald, H. Blocker and L. A. Marky (1986). Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 83: 3746-3750.

Dieffenbach, C. W., T. M. J. Lowe and G. S. Dveksler (1995). General concepts for PCR primer design. In: PCR Primer, A Laboratory Manual, Dieffenbach C. W., Dveksler G. S. Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York: 133-155.

Henegariu, O., N. A. Heerema, S. R. Dlouhy, G. V. Vance and P. H. Vogt (1997). Multiplex PCR: Critical Parameters and Step-by-Step Protocol. Bio-Techniques, 23: 504- 511.

Jain, S., M. N. Brahmbhait, D. N. Rank, C. G. Joshi and J. V. Solank (2007). Use of cytochrome b gene variability in detecting meat species by multiplex PCR assay. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 77: 880-888.

Kwok, S., D. E. Kellogg, N. McKinney, D. Spasic, L. Goda, C. Levenson and J. Sninsky (1990). Effects of primer-template mismatches on the polymerase chain reaction: Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 999-1005.

Mafra, I., A. Roxo, I. M. P. L. V. O. Ferreira and M. B. P. P. Oliveira (2007). A duplex polymerase chain reaction for the quantitative detection of cows’ milk in goats’milk cheese. International Dairy Journal, 17: 1132-1138.

Mangar (2015). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index. NCBI (2016). National Center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Rychlik, W., W. J. Spencer and R. E. Rhoads (1990). Optimization of annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 6409-6412.

Sakalar, E. and M. F. Abasiyanik (2011). Qualitative analysis of meat and meat products by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Afri. J. Biotechnology, 10: 9379-9386.

Teletchea, C., A. Maudet and C. Hänni (2005). Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol., 23: 359- 366.

Zahran, Sanan, D. and Azhar, S. Hagag (2015). Use of molecular biology techniques in the detection of fraud meat in Egyptian market. African Journal of Biotechnology, 14: 360- 364.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>